Everyone Hop On The Bailout Train!
January 7, 2009
“Larger corporations that can afford testing will incur thousands, maybe millions of dollars in fees, and this expense will be handed down to the consumer, probably making the prices for children’s products go through the roof.” Fluhr: “This law will put thousands of manufacturers of children’s products out of business -hurting our economy and causing even more loan defaults. Though this legislation was well-intentioned, it cannot be allowed to stand.”
That really sucks. What will wonderful websites like Etsy do? Why are we trying to kill off small-time artisans..especially with this economy? Is our land really the land of the corporate?
Gosh. I used to buy diy items on Ebay all the time. Special little items that someone else used and can now sell to me rather than throwing it away.This will only encourage people to buy new products rather than invest less money in more durable items. No more hand-me-downs. No more individual craftsartists.
This really makes everything seem so bleak. If it’s not factory-mass-produced, you can’t have it. What a crazy monopoly that we are presenting to large businesses. I’m rather distraught about this. If you click on the above link to the article there is a petition you can sign. As useful as that is.
Golly gee, can you imagine a black market for used products? People trying to sell their hand-made soap and jewelry? We could write dystopias on this.
But again, it’s not just the trouble of having a harder time consuming cheaply…charities are affected. I remember before I left England we randomly found a soup kitchen workshop and we asked them where we could donate our clothes and blankets since I can’t take them with me. She told us to bring them over tomorrow, they’d wash them for us. It was nice just to pack bookbags of clothes, blankets and other trinkets and give them to an organization directly.
The law isn’t evil, it’s trying to protect. Yet within this protection there is an excess. Sure we’re trying to keep people safe, but within the zealotry people get hurt, small businesses suffer, small people who can’t even count as a small business suffer.
Textbook Buy-back
December 17, 2008
If the Real World Used Textbook Buy-Back Policies
Buyer: I’ll give you $5,000 for it.
Homeowner: Are you crazy? I just paid $100,000 for it in January. Haven’t you heard of value appreciation?
Buyer: All I’m hearing is that your house is used.
Homeowner: Hardly. I spent like 2 days there in March and then 6 hours yesterday. This house is in perfect condition.
Buyer: Oh yeah, what’s this note above the backdoor?
Homeowner: It says, “Low door. Mind your head.”
Buyer: Low door, huh?
Homeowner: Yeah, but that’s not a problem. It’s just a feature of the house. It’s supposed to be like that. That’s just a helpful note in case people didn’t notice the height of the door.
Buyer: It sullies the whole house. The whole house is crap because of that note!
Homeowner: What are you talking about? This isn’t even a pretty house.
Buyer: So you admit it!
Homeowner: Yeah. It’s a stupid looking house on a boring block, but people still want to buy it. Haven’t you heard of supply and demand?
Buyer: Nope. And I’m not going to give you more than $5,000 for this dump. That’s just policy.
Homeowner: What are you talking about? What policy?
Buyer: Just policy.
Homeowner: Well, maybe I won’t sell it to you. Who knows, I might need this house in the future. It’s got pretty cool…faucets. I might want to use those. Ugh, fine. Give me the stupid 5 grand.
Buyer: Great doing business with you.
Ex-Buyer: Attention, all prospective buyers! Who wants to buy this fantastic, mint-condition home for $90,000?
Ex-Homeowner: What?!
Ex-Buyer: Sucker.
Blahblah market blah blah conversations blah blah please hold blah
November 25, 2008
72. We like this new marketplace much better. In fact, we are creating it.
74. We are immune to advertising. Just forget it.
False prophet of the internet age. Deluded in the idea of the meek inheriting cyberspace.
What do you mean we are creating it? What about digital enclosure? What about websites tracking your interests and selling them to companies? What about Facebook owning everything you put on there, even if you take it off? What about warrantless electronic wiretapping? The Patriot Acts? We’re helping big corporations get more out of us, sure…but creating it?
“Immune to Advertising”? Check out Emotional Branding or how about Born to Buy. Sure, maybe you are immune when you are an adult that was not brought up around advertisements or markets, but not when you’re young and you’re getting a very expensive education from companies.
Marketing firms and advertisers are looking to a younger demographic, increasingly targeting tweens and even younger children. And these kids have huge control over the flow of parents’ spending, statistics show — 8- to 12-year-olds spend $30 billion of their own money each year and influence another $150 billion of their parents’ spending.
Sure, you as an adult can be immune to advertising…but if children were so immune why would the companies spend so much money on making these children loyal from such a young age? They’re investing in their future consumers.
Markets aren’t really conversations. I don’t really know what ClueTrain means by this. That the CEO is talking to his consumers? That WalMart is treating their employees right? It seems like going through the internet is the best way to ignore conversation, considering you don’t have to see someone. It’s not like someone coming into your office demandning answers. Demanding discourse.
I think it’s important for our class to move into the direction of the market perspective. It is unavoidable as somehow it seems to me that everything on cyberspace is commodified. Everything is for sale, and everything is an object.
Obama Launches a Video Game Campaign
October 20, 2008
Obama Ad Campaign Targets Video Games
Following in the footsteps of leading-edge advertisers like Red Bull, the Obama campaign has diversified their ad blitz to include not only print and television spots, but also ads in social networking sites and video games.
The campaign has reportedly purchased ad space in several Internet-enabled video games running on Microsoft’s Xbox 360 platform. The titles include popular games like Burnout Paradise and Madden NFL ’09, and the ads will be restricted to users connecting from battleground states like Colorado, Florida, Ohio, Iowa, Indiana, Montana, North Carolina, New Mexico, and Wisconsin. The ads in the game burnout appear as billboards that say “Early voting has begun / VoteForChange.com.”
This is the latest tech-savvy step for a campaign that has shown unprecedented mastery of social networking, text messaging and targeted emailing to spread information about its candidate. This isn’t the Obama campaign’s first foray into non-traditional advertising, however; the candidate also sponsors spots on popular sites like Hulu.com, a streaming television site, as well as Google’s YouTube. If you’re a Facebook user, you’ve probably seen his ads there, too.
Whether or not this is a wise investment of last-minute capital — or if users even pay much attention to in-game ads — remains to be seen, but if Obama wins in November, it’s likely that other candidates will attempt to duplicate his strategy to enfranchise the elusive 18-34 age group.
You don’t need to click the link because this the entire thing, the rest of the link talks about dorky things that probably only I would care about such as Windows OS and Adobe Suites.
I also don’t know how effective in-game political ads would be but gosh darnit, that’s a very innovative strategy. His campaign is doing some interesting things. Regardless of what I feel about Obama, I have got to give him praise for awakening the 18-30 something demographic politically. We have been both ignored politically, and politically apathetic, and again the two feed into one another.
Is Voting for Young People? is a short, but concise book on the issues around youth voting. In a very short summary what is created is a rather vicious circle of a lack of participation and a lack of attention. Young people have a crappy voting record, so politicians hardly tailor to them because there is little benefit to them. At the same time, young people feel that they are not being represented politically, and in their resentment they become even more politically distant. The more distant they become, the less politicians pay attention to them. So what Obama has done is a national service, but also a great re-energizer to democracy. More representation to a part of the voting block that has been silent for many decades. Whether or not he wins, he has started (as my old History teacher would say) a fire under our asses to get us to act. To become political once again. To become interested and aware of politics. To participate. That’s pretty awesome. So while I supported Hillary, I do respect Obama for what he did.
The apathy of my peers is a great concern for me. While the statistical trend is that people become more political and more civically-engaged with age, I’m worried that the passitivity and indifference that most youth feel will carry on as they grow older.
As for bringing politics to video gamers, I think that’s awesome. Sure, I can see this being used for darker (and more annoying) purposes (you have to watch an ad before you can enjoy the glory of whatever game you’re playing, but also you will be opened up to marketing and ad-bombings). What I think is awesome is the fact that gamers are being acknowleged by political leaders. I’m rather sensitive about gaming (good god my obsession with WarCraft), and I think gamers, as a group, are often poorly described. But that’s a blog posdt for a different day.
Also…because I cannot resist..a game! It’s sort of like Risk. I had fun. How well did you do?


