The Name of Power
July 29, 2009
No it’s not some “elaborate Spiderman speech,” as my lover dubbed it when I emailed him that quote. It’s actually a guy speaking about why he took his wife’s last name when they got married. The article is short, and has sparked a lot of interesting conversations. Of course, I can’t wait till the day where it won’t. Where taking your wife’s last night isn’t something novel. Although, in homosexual couples, I wonder how this dynamic works. Do they hyphenate? Does one change their name? Do names matter as much? I’m weird about names since I changed my last name, for a variety of reasons but mainly because it suited me better. I am attached to my last name because I made it up. It’s so personal to me, since it had nothing to do with family or lovers, just my own identity. So if I am ever put into a marriage, or a civil union, (although I don’t really ever see that day coming) I would be reluctant to change my last name. One, because I like it. Two, because I do not approve of the tradition of taking someone else’s family name (I dislike how one-sided it is). I probably would only change it if the other person’s name was awesome, and I mean awesome. I think ideally, I’d love to make up a name together.
The responsibility of power, and the duty of it, actually reminds me of The Little Prince. The part with the fox. That chapter comes the closest to my conceptions of love and friendship, taming and love, and duty and responsibility. The connection between them could be from the way I was raised. No Hollywood romances, but families bound by duty. I knew love, as awesome as it can be, also had a lot of power and responsibility. You become responsible for what you have tamed, or what has chosen to be tamed by you–whether or not you chose it. I think that’s the funny thing about power, and control (a series of conversations I seem to perpetually be having), it’s the responsibility that comes with it…regardless of your choice in the matter. I suppose the only choice you do have is what you do with it, and how kind and compassionate you are to others. You may not even know why you have that power over someone else (or multiple someone else’s) but the fact is you do. You can try to deter them. You can be as honest as you can to them about your situation or your lack of interest in their love or the power they give you. I doubt that’ll do much, really. What can you do is be kind, and try to make them understand that they do not have to give you that power. That they should spend it on someone else. Then again, you could always chose never to wield that power. Never to abuse or use it. But isn’t power and control so delicious? Read the rest of this entry »
Is the sacrifice worth it?
April 23, 2009
I miss writing about technology, privacy and security.
During WWII people gave up so much (silk and such) for the war effort in order to fight a semi-tangible enemy (at least one that had a specific geo-political border). I guess it’s only fair to give up something intangible for something intangible (Terror, Drugs…).
Yet how do you know when the war is over? When do the rations stop?
There was Godwin’s Law and there were Six Degrees of Seperation…now there’s Wolfe’s Law: It All Leads Back to Terrorism
January 13, 2009
There. I said it.
Just like with Godwin’s Law, how every conversation eventually brings up Nazis, and with Stanley Milgram’s “small world experiment”, how everyone is generally connected to anyone else by a few small degrees of separation…
Now, now I coin the phrase, after yours truly, Wolfe’s Law: Everything leads to Terrorism in one way or another.
The below example is only one of many. See how many you can come up with!
Spotting Links to Terrorism, Inc.
“As companies expand their global reach, they risk smudging their reputations by linking up with less-than-savory regimes. Even firms with good reputations reach into dark corners.
Take Royal Dutch/Shell. Although highly regarded for its environmental and human rights stances, the oil giant is drilling in Iran. Or consider Swedish carmaker Volvo. Despite its nice-guy image, it has sold trucks to Iraq.
Until Sept. 11, no group formally screened publicly traded companies for their links to terrorism or the spread of weapons of mass destruction. But as the United States has focused on terrorism, so some groups have begun to look at companies linked to it, even peripherally.
Earlier this month, a socially responsible investors group announced it had compiled a list of nearly 300 such firms. The group, the Investor Responsibility Research Center (IRRC), along with the Conflict Securities Advisory Group (CSAG), prefers to sell its list to subscribers (at $12,500 a year) rather than make it public. Nevertheless, the statistics it has released make interesting reading.
For example, of the 260 or so firms linked to countries supporting terrorism and developing weapons of mass destruction, a third are European. More than a quarter come from Asia. Only 10 percent are American.”
Hymens and Semen
January 8, 2009
No more worry about losing your virginity. With this product, you can have your first night back anytime. Insert this artificial hymen into your vagina carefully. It will expand a little and make you feel tight. When your lover penetrate, it will ooze out a liquid that look like blood not too much but just the right amount. Add in a few moans and groans, you will pass through undetectable. Its easy to use, clinically proven non-toxic to human and has no side effects, no pain to use, no allergic reaction.
Main causes of hymen tore or break:
- Strenuous exercise (Gymnastics, sports, martial art, horse riding, etc)
- Premarital Sex
- Childhood accident (Hard object)
- Wearing a tampon for the first time
Made in Japan.
Expire: 2 years.How to use:
- Open the package and rub on the artificial hymen, then carefully put into the vagina. If vaginal is dry, dip the artificial hymen to water and then put it into the vagina as quickly as you can.
- Place inside vagina 15-20 minutes before intercourse
- Finally, cleans the vulva after having sexual intercourse.
The best thing is that it’s cheaper the more you buy. So if you need to slut it up with…people who actually want their girl to bleed and look in pain the first time they have sex (because of some tissue flap, not for BDSM reasons)..then you might as well buy in bulk!
| Qty | Pricing (for each) |
| 1 | USD 14.90 |
| 2 | USD 13.90 |
| 3 | USD 12.90 |
I wonder if virginity becomes a precious commodity in this recession. I mean, it would make sense that’s it’s ever more precious considering how sex-saturated (although sexually neurotic and unfulfilled) we are.
Speaking of sex. Semen has mind-control properties. You should read the full article, but I’ll post some enticing snippets.
“The more a woman has sex with her partner, the more committed she becomes, and the less attracted she is to other men — at least in the short-term. I blogged about this study several weeks ago”
“I describe a fascinating study at SUNY Albany that found that, yes, women who are regularly exposed to their partner’s semen are less depressed than women who use condoms most of the time. Hormones and proteins are absorbed through the vagina, enter the bloodstream, and possibly breach the blood-brain barrier.”
“Larger corporations that can afford testing will incur thousands, maybe millions of dollars in fees, and this expense will be handed down to the consumer, probably making the prices for children’s products go through the roof.” Fluhr: “This law will put thousands of manufacturers of children’s products out of business -hurting our economy and causing even more loan defaults. Though this legislation was well-intentioned, it cannot be allowed to stand.”
That really sucks. What will wonderful websites like Etsy do? Why are we trying to kill off small-time artisans..especially with this economy? Is our land really the land of the corporate?
Gosh. I used to buy diy items on Ebay all the time. Special little items that someone else used and can now sell to me rather than throwing it away.This will only encourage people to buy new products rather than invest less money in more durable items. No more hand-me-downs. No more individual craftsartists.
This really makes everything seem so bleak. If it’s not factory-mass-produced, you can’t have it. What a crazy monopoly that we are presenting to large businesses. I’m rather distraught about this. If you click on the above link to the article there is a petition you can sign. As useful as that is.
Golly gee, can you imagine a black market for used products? People trying to sell their hand-made soap and jewelry? We could write dystopias on this.
But again, it’s not just the trouble of having a harder time consuming cheaply…charities are affected. I remember before I left England we randomly found a soup kitchen workshop and we asked them where we could donate our clothes and blankets since I can’t take them with me. She told us to bring them over tomorrow, they’d wash them for us. It was nice just to pack bookbags of clothes, blankets and other trinkets and give them to an organization directly.
The law isn’t evil, it’s trying to protect. Yet within this protection there is an excess. Sure we’re trying to keep people safe, but within the zealotry people get hurt, small businesses suffer, small people who can’t even count as a small business suffer.
Textbook Buy-back
December 17, 2008
If the Real World Used Textbook Buy-Back Policies
Buyer: I’ll give you $5,000 for it.
Homeowner: Are you crazy? I just paid $100,000 for it in January. Haven’t you heard of value appreciation?
Buyer: All I’m hearing is that your house is used.
Homeowner: Hardly. I spent like 2 days there in March and then 6 hours yesterday. This house is in perfect condition.
Buyer: Oh yeah, what’s this note above the backdoor?
Homeowner: It says, “Low door. Mind your head.”
Buyer: Low door, huh?
Homeowner: Yeah, but that’s not a problem. It’s just a feature of the house. It’s supposed to be like that. That’s just a helpful note in case people didn’t notice the height of the door.
Buyer: It sullies the whole house. The whole house is crap because of that note!
Homeowner: What are you talking about? This isn’t even a pretty house.
Buyer: So you admit it!
Homeowner: Yeah. It’s a stupid looking house on a boring block, but people still want to buy it. Haven’t you heard of supply and demand?
Buyer: Nope. And I’m not going to give you more than $5,000 for this dump. That’s just policy.
Homeowner: What are you talking about? What policy?
Buyer: Just policy.
Homeowner: Well, maybe I won’t sell it to you. Who knows, I might need this house in the future. It’s got pretty cool…faucets. I might want to use those. Ugh, fine. Give me the stupid 5 grand.
Buyer: Great doing business with you.
Ex-Buyer: Attention, all prospective buyers! Who wants to buy this fantastic, mint-condition home for $90,000?
Ex-Homeowner: What?!
Ex-Buyer: Sucker.
Fetish or Excuse?
September 22, 2008
We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful what we pretend to be.
— Kurt Vonnegut, MOTHER NIGHT
For me, this quote goes to the heart of my consumption class. It both concerns and amuses me that I am always drawn to the arguments of theorists that advocate a totalizing system. Durkheim, Adorno and Horkheimer, Baudrillard, Weber… Why is it those theorists that create a world in which there is no individual or resistance, and that even resistance is, how we say, futile, that make sense to me? Why couldn’t be the cuter theorists? Why don’t I take them seriously at all? Why don’t I like Fiske’s argument that shopping is an empowering act for women, and that malls are the new public sphere that women can safely excel in without throwing away their femininity. Why is that unconvincing for me? I mean, I called him a “cute theorist”–that’s not nice. I for some reason do not consider him a serious academic because his theory isn’t as dominating as all the others.
Don’t I like resisting? Am I not an individual? If I did not believe resistance is possible–then why would I ever take these classes? Why would I ever want to know the true madness behind the methodology, if I couldn’t (or someone else) do anything about it? Would it be possible to know about the system, to see the invisible threads forcing us to need and consume, if there was no way out? Why wouldn’t I just be taking nice pleasant classes that keep me in my cave?
Do I simply prefer to have the excuse of the “totalizing system” if I fail to change anything?
Or, is it something more perverse in that since I’ve never had a typical patriarchal father figure that I am trying to find the image of the father that screams “NO!” in the oedipal sense in theory? Am I sublimating my desire for authority by only respecting theorists who have theories that restrict any movement or freedom? Do I need the security of control, rules, and boundaries, and so I prefer theories of large, ubiquitous theories that bind us all under a system of power and control?
I’ve been feeling incredibly faint, weary and dizzy the past two days from my period. When I feel like this I don’t want a domineering father figure but someone soft to cuddle, an animal is actually the most preferable in this instance. Everything is woozy. I nearly fainted in my class today. I’ve never fainted in my life, and I aim to keep it that way. I felt very pale and my limbs felt too large for my body. Thankfully my mouth obeyed my brain and I didn’t say something silly. You know, something silly like, I could have said something crazy about fetishing systems of domination and control to replace a male figure in my life to many people…





